|Posted on August 22, 2019 at 5:00 PM|
I generally love Lit Hub, but I was disappointed after reading Temple's article. I'm one of the few people who didn't understand what all the fuss was about with Roupenian’s "Cat People", so when I caught wind of this, I was excited to see a similar mindset or a dissection of what I was missing. Instead, after a delicious build-up of important issues and ideas, it ends with a thud:
'The reaction to this story—a work of literary fiction, don’t forget—has been overwhelmingly “me too,” and while I haven’t seen “#metoo,” that is unmistakably the landscape in which we are operating. Is that a bad thing? Is that a good thing? Does the fact that people love this story because they relate to it mean that it is not great literature? Does it mean that it is? I suppose everyone will have to decide for herself.'
Well...great. I already have my own opinions, thanks—I was hoping for the author of this piece to delve into hers. Instead, we get a collection of commentary from around the internet (oh good, I had no idea how to find tweets otherwise) and a tossed off quip passing for an ending: 'If a single non-reader stumbles on “Cat Person” and decided they’d better go read Bad Behavior, I’m ready to call it a win.'
Yeah. I guess.
Anyway, not sure we ever discussed literary pieces here, but if you read "Cat People", what did you think? All views are welcome, I love to hear different perspectives on stories.